I think it would be great to post some "so called orig" examples to point out the high end fakes being pushed out. These are a very tricky subject at times.
I was the guy who bought these, for 199 British pounds. They were not identified as repros in the auction. To the seller's good credit, he quickly provided a refund when asked.
I have another set, identifed as repros this time. I believe were made by the same maker, whoever he was. The belt loop dimensions and construction details of the leather tabs appear to be identical. The quality is really very nice, and they make a great set for the range. Magazines fit perfectly. They were US$150 and worth the price, I think. They were made with vintage canvas and leather. Whoever it is that is making these is getting better and better!
These pouches will probably be relisted.
Will do, Ham.
Here's another auction for a set of pouches, linked below.
I have a set identical to these, purchased from a seller in England a few years back for about US$75. He clearly identified them as repros. They have no markings and are very well made of old canvas and leather. They really have that old field gear smell to them. Magazines fit perfectly. I've had guys look at this set and say that these pouches are just too nice to be used for general range work, as they do not initially believe that they're repros.
These would be much more convincing if the leather did not have the rough side out. Again, the stitching is not at all correct. The seller below does not identify these as repros.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/German-MP40...635?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item27e4c1383b
Guys, instead of listing a bunch of links to known repros and some that I think are more than likely repro, here's an interesting link to some pouch info....
http://www.mp40.nl/index.php?page=original-pouches