Third Party Press

Another 1916 Danzig!

yellowkid

Senior Member
Heres the later purchase, and later rifle. Its 3496 ff. So this is like 180K later than the other one in the n block? Am i doing that right? how many of these things did they make that year?! Anyway I bought it because it just had a lot of character even tho I had a 1916 Danzig already. the price was reasonable too because the stock had some damage. theres two notches cut in to the stock ahead of the finger groove on the RH side. also there were what appeared to be stains around the finger grooves and receiver. So the gentleman was good enough to take a few dollars off! When I got it home and took a closer look at the stains, it appears to be from it wearing a bolt cover for a long time -- i put one next to the rifle in some of the pics to illustrate the point. the stains line up perfectly with the bolt cover when you snap it on. the notches I have no idea. though its clear they're old and deliberate. I'll tell you tho if you simply hold the rifle and slide your left hand forward your fingertips fall nicely in to the notches. might be that simple. grip just like the grooves. although i don't know that the germans would approve of defacing the weapon in that fashion.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0704.JPG
    IMG_0704.JPG
    82.2 KB · Views: 78
  • IMG_0705.jpg
    IMG_0705.jpg
    91 KB · Views: 74
  • IMG_0706.jpg
    IMG_0706.jpg
    100.9 KB · Views: 68
  • IMG_0707.jpg
    IMG_0707.jpg
    90.6 KB · Views: 69
  • IMG_0708.jpg
    IMG_0708.jpg
    91.3 KB · Views: 74
  • IMG_0709.jpg
    IMG_0709.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_0710.jpg
    IMG_0710.jpg
    82.9 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_0711.jpg
    IMG_0711.jpg
    76.2 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_0712.jpg
    IMG_0712.jpg
    89.3 KB · Views: 80
  • IMG_0713.jpg
    IMG_0713.jpg
    75.5 KB · Views: 82
last ones

heres the last ones
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0724.jpg
    IMG_0724.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_0725.jpg
    IMG_0725.jpg
    84.4 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_0726.JPG
    IMG_0726.JPG
    64.9 KB · Views: 59
  • IMG_0727.JPG
    IMG_0727.JPG
    71.3 KB · Views: 74
  • IMG_0728.JPG
    IMG_0728.JPG
    78.1 KB · Views: 59
  • IMG_0729.JPG
    IMG_0729.JPG
    92.8 KB · Views: 62
  • IMG_0730.JPG
    IMG_0730.JPG
    74.9 KB · Views: 43
more

sorry heres the last ones
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0714.jpg
    IMG_0714.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 39
  • IMG_0715.jpg
    IMG_0715.jpg
    59.4 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_0716.JPG
    IMG_0716.JPG
    93.4 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0717.JPG
    IMG_0717.JPG
    84.5 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0718.JPG
    IMG_0718.JPG
    78.3 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0719.JPG
    IMG_0719.JPG
    85.4 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_0720.jpg
    IMG_0720.jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_0721.JPG
    IMG_0721.JPG
    102.3 KB · Views: 60
  • IMG_0723.jpg
    IMG_0723.jpg
    61.3 KB · Views: 42
  • IMG_0724.jpg
    IMG_0724.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 30
This is a much nicer rifle, totally right from the acceptance pattern.

You are doing it right, Danzig used both the "i" & "j" blocks, the only one known to have done so. They made at least 430k in 1916, some reports go even higher. One reporting from a Polish website stated 500k, whether they made it that high is anyone's guess, but by serial ranges they are known into the 430k ranges (over 430k).
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top