Third Party Press

jhv 42 pix

Pisgah

Moderator²
Staff member
Nice afternoon and a chance to use the camera.
 

Attachments

  • DSC03598.jpg
    DSC03598.jpg
    283.6 KB · Views: 164
  • DSC03595.jpg
    DSC03595.jpg
    280.6 KB · Views: 133
  • DSC03596.jpg
    DSC03596.jpg
    293.3 KB · Views: 142
  • DSC03597.jpg
    DSC03597.jpg
    272 KB · Views: 176
  • DSC03599.jpg
    DSC03599.jpg
    308.1 KB · Views: 179
  • DSC03601.jpg
    DSC03601.jpg
    315.1 KB · Views: 140
  • DSC03604.jpg
    DSC03604.jpg
    281.2 KB · Views: 167
  • DSC03603.jpg
    DSC03603.jpg
    283.3 KB · Views: 136
  • DSC03607.jpg
    DSC03607.jpg
    299.1 KB · Views: 144
  • DSC03605.jpg
    DSC03605.jpg
    312.3 KB · Views: 120
  • DSC03606.jpg
    DSC03606.jpg
    321 KB · Views: 123
  • DSC03593.jpg
    DSC03593.jpg
    304 KB · Views: 174
  • DSC03594.jpg
    DSC03594.jpg
    304.4 KB · Views: 107
Last edited:
Nice

Very nice Pisgah,
Even though there were 32,000 produced '42 seems to be the rarest ever seen or able to acquire.
Thanks for posting :thumbsup:
 
Very nice Pisgah,
Even though there were 32,000 produced '42 seems to be the rarest ever seen or able to acquire.
Thanks for posting :thumbsup:

Yes, pisgah, super nice.

41's and 43's are much more common for sure. While as a year 44's show up less than 42's it can be misleading. 42 has two distinct variations, top accepted WaA173 like this and the earlier side accepted WaA56 variety. Considering the split these are pretty hard to find.
 
So here's the rest of the story on this one. As many of you know, I have a kind heart when it comes to sporter rescues. I picked this one up several years back missing its cut foreend and handguard. A fairly well known gunsmith had a stock guy he occasionally used who made a batch of handguards and foreend repair pieces for the G98/40. I'm thinking I received the repair pieces about four years ago but didn't have the repair done until recently. If you look hard enough at the grain between the bands you can kind of see it is different than the rest of the foreend. Regardless, I think it is pretty good and was surprised at how well it turned out. If I ran into it on a rack I don't think I would figure out that it was wearing replacement wood, other than the bayonet mount and upper band which are mismatched (didn't receive these pieces when I bought the rifle). I promised 3371940 that I would post some photos when it came back so that was the motivation for the thread.
 
ahhhh

So you didn't give us the final clue.....pic of the the upper band...No pic sticky for you Pisgah......:laugh:

I now have to do a grain analysis of all my rifles.....thanks :moon:
 
I thought it was odd that you kept showing photos of that area but I never had a clue something was replaced. It's easy to spot AFTER you pointed it out. I'd still like to own that rifle. Very very nice :thumbsup:.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top