I was at a show recently and looked at a Gewehr 98. The receiver was not marked, and did not appear to have been scrubbed. German commercial proof marks B&U on the left side of the ring. No serial numbers that I could see. Lange Vezier, though I did not note 200m vs 400m. No Imperial acceptance marks or Weimar marks that I could see. Photography is not permitted otherwise I would have taken a fair share of pictures.
What struck me as odd, and continues to irritate me, is the stock. It had a thin standard band as a Gewehr 98 would. The stock, for all that I could see, was a standard 98 stock, grasping grooves but marking disc. What has been bothereing me, is on the left side of the stock, there was a sling cutout with a steel bar for attaching the sling.
The rifle was labeled a Whermannsgewehr, which I do not believe it was. The barreled assembly looked original, the stock possibly something else, and the bands fit and finish did not seem to match. Possibly something built post WW1. It was chambered, according to the tag in 8.15x46, and the bolt was modified for it.
Out of my realm of knowledge but I am quite interested to learn. A Whermannsgewehr has been on my list.
What struck me as odd, and continues to irritate me, is the stock. It had a thin standard band as a Gewehr 98 would. The stock, for all that I could see, was a standard 98 stock, grasping grooves but marking disc. What has been bothereing me, is on the left side of the stock, there was a sling cutout with a steel bar for attaching the sling.
The rifle was labeled a Whermannsgewehr, which I do not believe it was. The barreled assembly looked original, the stock possibly something else, and the bands fit and finish did not seem to match. Possibly something built post WW1. It was chambered, according to the tag in 8.15x46, and the bolt was modified for it.
Out of my realm of knowledge but I am quite interested to learn. A Whermannsgewehr has been on my list.