trinxet
Senior Member
Sorry for the bad quality of the photos!. the WaA135 is bad stamped thats normal?. The scope it's not its own
The WaA135 is suspicious, but I'm surprised that you even don't like the mount bases, the rear one seemed good for me. what a mined land is the sniper thema....
what do you think about this low turret?. For me looks great , but?
The WaA135 is suspicious, but I'm surprised that you even don't like the mount bases, the rear one seemed good for me. what a mined land is the sniper thema....
what do you think about this low turret?. For me looks great , but?
The WaA135 is suspicious, but I'm surprised that you even don't like the mount bases, the rear one seemed good for me. what a mined land is the sniper thema....
what do you think about this low turret?. For me looks great , but?
Thanks for your comments, the photos were done at an gun show and few time to do them...I was looking the new volume IIa and i found in page 216 and similar WaA135 stamp in an HT in k letter block as this is in the l block maybe....just compare them look somewhat similar
About the LT it has hiper price, and.....
Thanks for posting your rifle is pretty nice, would it be possible to post an detailed photo of the WaA135 stamp please?. Is just to compare them!My 43 LT in the i block is numbered matching on the scope ring. it is duffle cut(I later acquired the matching duffle cut walnut stock, which I need to but back on it) and bolt mismatched though.
The OP rifle sure has highly polished bases.