Third Party Press

Modified Frog?

Dawkind

Senior Member
I read something here about a similar frog but can’t find it...

I’ve had this for a while and would like to see if you knowledgeable folks would be able to give me some insight on this....thanks!

1bf9bd2e75cd7275c2cb6f06c1317aec.heic


8f42726b887d6ab37442d362555423b2.heic


e2a6db55927687a13d8d0f32ba75dc78.heic


8a8c80963524442754ba3073161ee20a.heic


0cdb7052968b6f1260844fc0648dc4b9.heic


0d7ff4462eceeb1f864225a9417e6f86.heic


d637a96a3ed07b78c0c92766242ff5ab.heic


bcfb18e9e8d3e58e8bb6838f1de57a0f.heic


998590013fb4d0fe09c92b38b99aa854.heic



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
A well seasoned frog it is. Somewhat unusual marking...don't think I have ever encountered this particular manufacturer before. A. Carter mentions this maker with verified examples from 1940 & 1941. He also referred to this form as BBF #310. However, the cross-strap for #310 is sandwiched between the front & rear sections of the frog body and retained by three lines of stitching. Your example has slots for the strap which look rather crude, so this could be a conversion (#312).
 
Last edited:
maker probably Franz.Jos. Rothe Braunschweig (Slash is expert about frogs) possible made before 1940 and secure strap added in field post 1940. b.r.Andy
 
Andrej is correct. The marking is FRANZ JOS. ROTHE > BRAUNSCHWEIG > "illegible date" for the maker Franz Joseph Rothe Sattleren of Braunschweig. Have examples dated 1935 through 1942. This firm manufactured their frogs with retentions straps in this manner with the slots through the body. The combination of aluminum and steel hardware is a bit unusual but observed with some frequency. Or the strap could have been repaired or replaced in the field as previously suggested. Nice honest piece in my opinion.
 
Thank you Gentlemen very much for your expertise.....it's much different than any of the other K98k bayonet frogs that I have. :thumbsup:
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top