You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser.
-
-
1
To address the question in post 1.
That is a long known and accepted variation of a 1936 contract gun.
Unusual but by no means unique...
-
1
You willing to share some details on [1] 7521?
You have a late 1936 there and internal markings are likely like a 1937.
-
1
Interesting that you gathered that much solid info from these images.
You may want to look into what H. Krieghoff Waffenfabrik was...
-
1
I am not worth a crap at writing but this link should help some.
Latest all original example I have pawed was 11/44 but no pics.
The...
-
1
SEMPERT & KRIEGHOFF used this logo starting in about 1927 and stayed with it till the end of the war.
Did not use "fzs".
That is H...
-
1
Probably should have not said "failed twice".
Should have said it appears to have been set aside twice by "in-house" inspection.
These...
-
1
Thanks for the reply.
Pretty well settles why your gun is one of the "added 1" guns.
Note the barrel has the original serial.
Like...
-
1
That is where they usually are.
Is this the "added 1" gun this thread is about?
-
1
Reject mark.
Where is yours?
Not common but not unique.
This example has no barrel gauge but has a "0" stamped into the side of the...
-
1
You mean this? Front frame well of 1937 Krieghoff.
-
Loading…
-
Loading…