Unmarked bolt parts?
- Thread starter usdog
- Start date
Herk1994
Senior Member
How about any little markings, on the other side of the safety and the shroud itself? Also check the back of the cocking piece, and the firing pin if you’re familiar with disassembly.
Could very well be armorer’s parts on the bolt. The lack of serial numbers and finish is consistent with such a claim, but inspection marks would prove this
Bob in OHIO
Senior Member
It’s not a dou gun, but a dot 1943, based on the font & e/63 on the top center of the receiver. All bolt parts would be numbered from Brünn 1 (dot).... and not a fan of the bolt numbers...
Last edited:
Muncher 1953
Senior Member
We can see the dot13 code in the shield on the barrel, what might be a likely scenario for a dou marked receiver being assembled into a rifle by Brunn 1 ? (as the ‘dou.’ mark doesn’t ‘appear’ to be messed with)
Bob in OHIO
Senior Member
Who knows exactly why a dou receiver ended at dot.... perhaps rejected or surplus to dou.
Here's another "h-block" in my collection but in walnut wood
... another walnut example is shown in Vol 2b (p. 676) from Karem and Steves. That example is an n-block
Here's another "h-block" in my collection but in walnut wood
... another walnut example is shown in Vol 2b (p. 676) from Karem and Steves. That example is an n-blockAttachments
Last edited:
Muncher 1953
Senior Member
thx
thx for info & more great pix! I will check my 2b later, after I take the kids to to airport (had to put books away for ‘company’…..)Who knows exactly why a dou receiver ended at dot.... perhaps rejected or surplus to dou.
Here's another "h-block" in my collection but in walnut wood
