Was talking to some other Forum members on the subject of an armorers spare marked safety. I was asked if I considered them
to be correct. I always did but i wonder how other Forum members feel about this issue. Parts on a Kar 98k can break or malfunction
get damaged or get lost (entire bolt). A rear area armorer corrects the issue with spare parts and sends the rifle back up to the
front line troops to use again. Yes, the replaced parts are not the ones it left the factory with but they are not mis-matched numbered
ones either. Mostly, I'm talking about spare parts marked S/42 or byf other factory coded spares.
How do you guys look upon this?
Tks,
Bob32268
to be correct. I always did but i wonder how other Forum members feel about this issue. Parts on a Kar 98k can break or malfunction
get damaged or get lost (entire bolt). A rear area armorer corrects the issue with spare parts and sends the rifle back up to the
front line troops to use again. Yes, the replaced parts are not the ones it left the factory with but they are not mis-matched numbered
ones either. Mostly, I'm talking about spare parts marked S/42 or byf other factory coded spares.
How do you guys look upon this?
Tks,
Bob32268