84/98 deutsche reichsbahn kÖln d.r.22

stabsfeldwebel2

Senior Member

• Apr 24, 2021

• #1

84/98 Deutsche Reichsbahn KÖLN d.r.22

 

Attachments

• 
  DSCN4799.jpg

  238.5 KB · Views: 29
• 
  DSCN4800.jpg

  259.8 KB · Views: 35
• 
  DSCN4801.jpg

  192.5 KB · Views: 32
• 
  DSCN4803.jpg

  164 KB · Views: 27
• 
  DSCN4804.jpg

  155 KB · Views: 34
• 
  DSCN4805.jpg

  218.9 KB · Views: 32
• 
  DSCN4810.jpg

  109.8 KB · Views: 39
• 
  DSCN4808.jpg

  134.6 KB · Views: 36

AndyB

Senior Member

• Apr 24, 2021

• #2

Looks certainly interesting, the frog is probably for police. Is there any mashining on blade visible, as the scabbard looks like pre 1940.

 

P

pwcosol

Senior Member

• Apr 25, 2021

• #3

Have not seen any DR marked S84/98s other than early, unattributed "narrow-blade" examples. I wonder if this bayonet is also a narrow-blade, but possibly re-gripped/refurbished. The marking on the crossguard certainly looks good. Also concur with Andy on the frog, which is a nice example on it's own...

 

stabsfeldwebel2

Senior Member

• Apr 25, 2021

• #4

AndyB said:

Looks certainly interesting, the frog is probably for police. Is there any mashining on blade visible, as the scabbard looks like pre 1940.

Click to expand...

Hi Andrej there are no mashining on blade..all looks good

 

AndyB

Senior Member

• Apr 25, 2021

• #5

Hi, in picture 2 there looks like mashining spures in fuller of blade, same as the crossguard surface is not extra polished, so there is question is of same date as scabbard as scabbard should be pre 1940, secondly i dont known the "22" is a district number but Koeln have different number 15 when i remember correctly.

 

stabsfeldwebel2

Senior Member

• Apr 26, 2021

• #6

close up pics

Hi Andrei.
You right it can be a mix up..but in that case it is hard to see…
take a look of these close up pics.

Correct! 22 is Nürnberg NOT Köln.

 

Attachments

• 
  DSCN4811.jpg

  79.8 KB · Views: 7
• 
  DSCN4813.jpg

  101.1 KB · Views: 7
• 
  DSCN4814.jpg

  70.3 KB · Views: 8
• 
  DSCN4815.jpg

  125.7 KB · Views: 6
• 
  DSCN4817.jpg

  95.5 KB · Views: 7
• andy 1.pdf

  352.7 KB · Views: 21
• andy 2.pdf

  275.9 KB · Views: 14

AndyB

Senior Member

• Apr 26, 2021

• #7

Thanks for adding the table, i had only copy of it. About the details, the blade is mashined in way as typical for late 1941/42 period, certainly not correct with lined hook of scabbard, but it could be so joined for long time, even from start, when older spare scabbards could be used on that contract?.Blades in 1938/9 were still in high end polish.