Third Party Press

FG42 and its Grenade Launcher

Guillaume d'Orange

Senior Member
The Luftwaffe tested the FG42 for quite some time, certainly from at least February 24, 1943 until April 16, 1943.
Those dates appear in a trial report performed in Tarnewitz dated July 2, 1943.

Two grenade launchers were tested, but as Michael Heidler wrote in the following article in Small Arms Review:
"The rifle grenade launcher for the FG 42 has neither been officially introduced nor issued to the troops."


The two configurations were:
#1 : launcher sight 235 m and cup launcher 171 mm length.
#2 : launcher sight 250 m and cup launcher 176 mm length.

Here is #1 attached to an FG42:

235m.jpg
Here is #2:

250m.jpg

You can easily see that #1 and #2 have different mounts and that the mag shall be removed to fix #2 on the upper rail of the receiver.
You can also notice that there is a notch or recess on top of the receiver between the magazine well and the handguard, (below circled in red) that allows to fix #1:

250m - Circled.jpg

The rifles pictured in the Tarnewitz report were pre-series made by Rheinmetall. Currently, I have gathered a good amount of pics of various Type 1/Type E with the fzs code (presumably all made by Krieghoff).

I have noticed the following weird thing, no Type 1 with a serial number below #973 has the notch circled above, whereas all the ones after #1151 have it.

Here is #973:
FG42 - #973 - small.jpg

Here is #1151:

1151 (1).jpg


Why ? I don't know. Am I the first to discover this ? Is this even correct ?
Differing views are welcome.
 
Last edited:
I know of an fg42 that was ground dug in Berlin by a US service member in the 60’s-70’s that had a grenade launcher cup attached. He used to display it in Austin at the Camo Mabry museum.
 
Even if the grenade launcher set was never officially introduced, I would expect the Luftwaffe to have ordered at least 1000 copies of the 235m/171mm set to fit the 1000 or so Type 1 FG42s with the notch/recess.
There is a "Schiessbecher" pictured on Espeholt's website with a BAL1 stamp (Rheinmetall, correct ?):

1726506552628.png

Source :
 
BAL1 would be Rheinmetall (probably the plant at Sömmerda, but not 100% on that), but that looks like a normal WaA to me.

Here is the pic of the damaged FG with launcher still attached.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20240917_015215229.jpg
    PXL_20240917_015215229.jpg
    200.3 KB · Views: 14
BAL1 would be Rheinmetall (probably the plant at Sömmerda, but not 100% on that), but that looks like a normal WaA to me.

Here is the pic of the damaged FG with launcher still attached.
That’s the one. I bought some good 98k’s from him.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top