Aaron
Senior Member
Yes as straightforward and seemingly impolite my statement was, my rationale was this:Wasn’t directing anything to you. Actually said you understood the key concept. All good from me.
1. 99.99% of collectors do not have the facilities, materials, knowledge, or patience required to restore leather goods properly.
2. 99.99% of collectors will default to using the substances explicitly listed as being damaging in the previous link.
3. Those who can restore leather goods are specialized workers with training and/or certifications, collectors have neither.
Assuming points 1. 2. and 3., I consider it best to tell collectors to do nothing at all to their leather, than to say there are ways to restore leather.
The vast majority of collectors will misdiagnose the issues or will be over-zealous in their "treatment", so it is best to have a bunch of un-treated items than to have a bunch of irreversibly damaged items in the pool of surviving examples.
My apologies for the blunt delivery.
Last edited: