S/155G + S/177K bayonets
- Thread starter Dane76
- Start date
grimlin13
Senior Member
The S/155 G ( Horster, 1935) is the better of the two, shows no sharpening on blade but it has no scabbard? The grips are in good condition.
The S/177 (E.Pack & Sn, 1934) is not something I would consider collectable. The blade is sharpened, the handle has been altered by adding aluminum? grips and the scabbard is not original to bayonet but may be a WWII German replacement (which isn`t a bad thing necessarily). It still doesn`t make it any better.
The S/177 (E.Pack & Sn, 1934) is not something I would consider collectable. The blade is sharpened, the handle has been altered by adding aluminum? grips and the scabbard is not original to bayonet but may be a WWII German replacement (which isn`t a bad thing necessarily). It still doesn`t make it any better.
AndyB
Senior Member
Same opinion, unfortunally the S/155 G is wout scabbard, but the condition here is ok, well used, with remains of blue on blade, and worried off on handle, looks like blade should be oiled.
The S/177K also Pack from 1934 would be more scarce, unfortunally not in period condition, the scabbard was force matched probably by germans, the alu grips are typical for postwar owner, are replacements, normally there should be wood grips. The blade was too cleaned visible on scratches along the edge, same as some rust areas.
The S/177K also Pack from 1934 would be more scarce, unfortunally not in period condition, the scabbard was force matched probably by germans, the alu grips are typical for postwar owner, are replacements, normally there should be wood grips. The blade was too cleaned visible on scratches along the edge, same as some rust areas.
Last edited:
