BNZ 4 Rune

[ugafx4]

What are everyone's thoughts on this rifle?

 

[ugafx4]

Last photo.

 

[swjXE]

Humped up. Run like hell, numerous problems.

 

[Remfan]

I'll say. Looks like someone was hittin the Jack Daniels when applying those numbers!

 

[NTA]

BNZ 4 Rune

I'll say. Looks like someone was hittin the Jack Daniels when applying those numbers!

 

[nosbocaj]

Yikes. This thing is a mess. Gunbroker or somewhere else?

 

[ugafx4]

Yikes. This thing is a mess. Gunbroker or somewhere else?

Can you give me some specifics? What do you see?

 

[sheepdog]

I leery of anything that has white paint fill

 

[bruce98k]

current thread

For one its in the wrong stock so that in itself is a deal killer.

 

[heavy_mech]

Can you give me some specifics? What do you see?

Well I'd like to see the barrel code.

 

[swjXE]

Safety should be numbered, bolt shroud has had a number ground off to make it look correct. MO style 2 on rear band. ( not used by Steyr), Stamped triggerguard has had a number and/or waff scrubbed off, Whole rifle has been cold blued, just to add to the list.

 

[ugafx4]

For one its in the wrong stock so that in itself is a deal killer.

Safety should be numbered, bolt shroud has had a number ground off to make it look correct. racetrack style 0 on rear band. ( not used by Steyr), just to add to the list.

Getting some traction here. There is a lot of stuff going on when this rifle.

 

[swjXE]

Getting some traction here. There is a lot of stuff going on when this rifle.

What I meant to say about the rear band is that it has a MO style 2, not used by Steyr. But the 0 is overstruck with the wrong font and the 5 was originally a 3.

 

[nosbocaj]

Can you give me some specifics? What do you see?

Looks like others covered it, but the numbers don't look like Steyr (the 2 looks really weird) and there's nothing on the safety. Stock looks off too, but I wasn't sure until Bruce mentioned it. I was watching that Steyr 660 on Gunbroker this last week, so I've spent a bit of time on that chapter.