It's not a G43.No idea but I've never seen those milling marks on any G43..
Depends on how WECSOG we're talking. Could have had a retaining nut behind it, plenty of room for that.Wouldn’t it be threaded if that was the case?
Are you talking about the chatter marks between the flat where the model info is stamped and the rear sight?The left side of the receiver is machined in a very strange, unusual way. I don't even know what kind of tool would leave this "non slip" pattern.
Those are some fantastic milling marks. My Walther G41 is similar but not that cool.The left side of the receiver is machined in a very strange, unusual way. I don't even know what kind of tool would leave this "non slip" pattern.
This is an excellent observation. None of the other examples in the reference are like this nor is my example nor is the opposite side of the receiver for that matter. They all have a grain that runs parallel to the scope rail (milled horizontally). How would this have been achieved?The left side of the receiver is machined in a very strange, unusual way. I don't even know what kind of tool would leave this "non slip" pattern.
You can see what looks like a very slightly raised burr around the hole, especially around the ~7-11 o clock positions and around the 2-3 o'clock positions. If the hole had been drilled prior to milling that burr wouldn't be there, and any burr would be on the inside of the hole instead.This is an excellent observation. None of the other examples in the reference are like this nor is my example nor is the opposite side of the receiver for that matter. They all have a grain that runs parallel to the scope rail (milled horizontally). How would this have been achieved?
The drilled hole almost appears to have been made prior the milling. Is the hole blued inside as JB asked above?