HZa stamped M.95 Mannlicher Stutzenkarabiner

Pat

Moderator
Staff member
Fair warning! I want to use you guys as a sounding board for an approach I’d like to try. I usually post new acquisitions with photos and a description, but not much else. I want to test out what you could describe as a ‘360 degree’ approach. My goal is to situate and contextualize the featured items in their own historical setting, and blend them into a micro and macro historical presentation of physical items, eye witness accounts, historical documents, and photographic evidence. Let me know what you think.

M.95 Mannlicher Stutzenkarabiner

I was fortunate to acquire this depot stamped M.95 Mannlicher recently, which has some very attractive features. It is still chambered in 8X50R and is all matching. There are no indications of re-numbering or replacement of parts.

Three aspects of this carbine are of particular interest. It has a uniquely Hungarian front sight protector, a type otherwise only seen on 31M short rifles that went through the same chamber modifications to 8X56R as the Mannlichers that remained in Austrian possession after 1919. There is a stamp on the right side of the stock near the receiver which I’ve never seen in the flesh. The only example I’ve ever seen is on Manowar’s Hungarian small arms website, and even then it’s shown without attribution or context at the end of the 35M rifle section. I’ve asked around but apparently haven’t yet found the answer I’m looking for. Finally, there is an HZa depot stamp from Wels, Austria on the right side butt stock. Awhile back I was able to locate an Austro-Hungarian M.1890 Extra Corps Gewehr (see here: https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/hza-stamped-austro-hungarian-model-1890-extra-corps-gewehr.34667/ ) with the same stamp.

Foreign captured Mannlichers and the German depots

While not unheard of, it’s very uncommon for two Mannlicher carbines (still in Austria) to retain their 8X50R chambering. My M.1890 was very likely captured in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia following the German invasion of April 1941. Yugoslavia retained many of thousands of Mannlichers that weren’t converted to the M.95M standard in the 1930s, and this was probably one of them. Even though Mannlichers originated in the Austro-Hungarian Empire (Steyr and Budapest), it’s likely that German forces who captured these felt the need to confirm caliber and determine what if any modifications might have been made, necessitating examination by qualified armorers and Ordnance personnel at the depots. At that point, it’s likely they would have received the depot stamp.

Wels: Background and Wartime Role

Wels lies in the Oberdonau region of (upper) Austria. After the Anschluss, Wels became the location for Infantry and Artillery units of the Wehrmacht’s Ersatzheer, providing a training ground and recruiting area for Wehrkreis XVII. Located at a railway junction, it had an airport, aerodrome and aircraft factory nearby. Operating under the parent company of Fichtel and Sachs, Rotax-Werk AG produced ball bearings and engines in Wels. Not surprisingly, it became an area of interest in the Allied bombing campaign.

According to unit records, it appears that the 450th and 459th Bomber Groups were assigned responsibility for destroying the Wehrmacht’s capacity to produce war materiel at Wels. The details of these raids are confirmed in the USAAF Worldwide Operations Chronology. Starting in early 1944, Wels would be bombed into March 1945, with marshalling yards and ordnance factories noted as the focus of operations. During one raid on 20 March 1945, a young American pilot developed engine trouble in his P-51C Mustang and had to bail out over Wels. He landed unharmed and was taken prisoner. His unit would go on to receive post-war accolades, its members forming a part of what later emerged as the Civil Rights Movement in the USA. Young 1LT. Newman Camay Golden, a Tuskegee Airman, was later liberated and would remain in the USAAF as it transitioned into the USAF. Golden answered the call once again in 1951. On 17 October 1951, Golden was flying a P-51D night fighter with the 39th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, 18th Fighter Bomber Group in the vicinity of Choso-ri, Korea. On that date, Golden’s aircraft received a direct hit from AA fire, subsequently crashing and bursting into flames. First listed as MIA, Golden would be declared KIA on 31 March 1954.

Wels and the Holocaust

A darker chapter of Germany’s wartime armaments production would be played out in Wels, as it had in numerous other locations in Austria. It became the site of two of Mathausen’s sub-camps, Wels I (Gunskirchen-Wels) and Wels II (Ebensee-Wels). Consisting partly of underground facilities, the two camps combined to produce aircraft, armaments and metal construction.

More forced labor arrived in the form of Hungarian Jews that had been sent west following both the closure of Auschwitz-Birkenau (to which many Hungarian Jews had been sent or had been slated to be sent), and the seizure of Budapest by the Soviet Army. Arriving in Wels, the Jews had survived a little known death march, the only ‘respite’ being their assignment to dig hasty tank trenches and defenses in western Hungary and eastern Austria in an attempt to slow the Soviet advance. They had arrived in April 1945 and joined the ranks of slave laborers already assigned to work in Wels’ factories.

Wels’ wartime role came to an end on 4 May 1945, when lead elements of the US 71st Cavalry Reconnaissance Troop located and engaged a German convoy between Wels and Lambach. Proceeding forward, they also located numerous buildings inside a securely fenced enclosure. They were greeted by the surviving Jews and slave laborers, who soon revealed the nature of the facility and the wider reality of the Holocaust. The 71st scrambled to bring together as much food as possible, emptying their ‘C’ and ‘K’ rations for the prisoners. In short order, the 60th US Field Hospital erected and put five temporary hospitals into operation, attending to the liberated prisoners and the c.2,500 surviving Hungarian Jews.

Final thoughts

Although the foreign weapons inspection role of the Wels depot was dwarfed by aircraft and armaments production nearby, it still holds the attention of collectors. I haven’t seen ex-depot Mannlichers stamped by any other facility, and it is also known for marking Mannlicher M.95 bayonets and even some K98k depot build rifles. It’s possible that the fact that those Mannlichers had an Austrian origin played some role in their being stored in Austria. Once could also surmise that there were experienced armorers still alive at that time in Austria, along with Mannlicher-specific tools and spare parts. In any case, it begs the question of if and how those carbines were used after processing through the depot.

If any of you have seen or know of the circular marking I drew attention to, I'd love to hear about it. I do wonder if there is any kind of a Hungarian connection to it at all. It's anyone's guess how the 31M front sight protector wound up on this rifle. These are very difficult to locate, so it's not really something that a collector pulls off of a 31M and throws on to another rifle.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8973.jpeg
    IMG_8973.jpeg
    241.6 KB · Views: 63
  • IMG_9240.jpeg
    IMG_9240.jpeg
    224.6 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_9241.jpeg
    IMG_9241.jpeg
    300.6 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_9242.jpeg
    IMG_9242.jpeg
    497.6 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_9239.jpeg
    IMG_9239.jpeg
    284.7 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_9233.jpeg
    IMG_9233.jpeg
    255 KB · Views: 60
  • IMG_9247.jpeg
    IMG_9247.jpeg
    309.8 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:
Rifle markings of interest and sling-
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9243.jpeg
    IMG_9243.jpeg
    369.2 KB · Views: 48
  • IMG_9106.jpeg
    IMG_9106.jpeg
    175.3 KB · Views: 48
  • IMG_9108.jpeg
    IMG_9108.jpeg
    364.9 KB · Views: 47
  • IMG_9245.jpeg
    IMG_9245.jpeg
    519.1 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_9246.jpeg
    IMG_9246.jpeg
    495.1 KB · Views: 43
B24s bombing Wels, Jewish children and Free French medical soldiers in Wels after liberation, and 1LT Golden.
 

Attachments

  • B-24_Liberator_over_Wels_Austria.jpeg
    B-24_Liberator_over_Wels_Austria.jpeg
    63.9 KB · Views: 23
  • 55740.jpeg
    55740.jpeg
    388 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_9252.jpeg
    IMG_9252.jpeg
    70.1 KB · Views: 23
Interesting info here, the Stutzen was made from a long rifle, as visible the barell is a shortage, Ws1 were many time observed on untouched items in origin condition, mainly too on captured, so its more as real this was obtained in Yugoslavia, because i believe the U (Y)on buttstock was most real used on yugoslavian rifles refurbishment, question remains who made the shortage, most real the sight guard was added there.
The presented bayonet is already a Sidearm as not possible to attach on any rifle, it was overhauled and most real is a M1888 shortage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
Just want to say that I love the extra context and the effort that goes into it. Its something that I have a personal interest in and focus on in my own collecting, and think gets lost in the weeds sometimes while we’re focusing on SN ranges and technical details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
I would tend to agree that this probably originally came out of Yugoslavia. After that, though, I think the story becomes more complicated and murky.

The AC1 looks an awful lot like an Italian marking to me. Possibly captured by Italy, reworked, then seized by the Germans in 1943? Possible, but this is complicated by the Ws1.

Wels was an HZa prior to the start of the war, but by the end of the war, it seems to have vanished. Most online sources of info (Lexikon, etc.) don't even mention Wels. A 1942 document also lists Wien as the HZa for units attached to WK XVII. HZa Wien-Simmering existed by 1941 (Obstlt. Josef Zimmerer was the Kommandant effective 20 March 1941), and I have seen it mentioned that Wels was closed and moved to Wien at the same time. But this is complicated by a seemingly legit bnz42 we have posted here that is Ws1 marked. So perhaps Wels continued on as an HNZa? I don't know.


I think the Hungarian sight protector is probably a later collector addition, as the screws are a bit buggered. I suppose its possible the gun was provided to Hungary as aid, but I don't think the Hungarians would have wanted a 31M in 8x50R. I don't think they continued using the older cartridge at all, but maybe they did for Gendarmerie use?
 

Attachments

  • Thorn doc.jpg
    Thorn doc.jpg
    193.2 KB · Views: 13
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
I personally would inspect the barell, same as the lower ring looks from hungarian M95/31. The back sight is from long rifle, hungarians distance marked it different way. It could be that this shortage was mixed with parts of hungarian M95/31 - lower ring and muzzle protector. The muzzle part in front of sights is too long.Should be proofed on parts how are marked, K or R or different letter. So various pictures would be here needed to see. Dissasembly from buttstock would help to see marking on barell area under wood. The buttplate is clean? the barell previous proof is Wn eagle 17?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
Interesting info here, the Stutzen was made from a long rifle, as visible the barell is a shortage, Ws1 were many time observed on untouched items in origin condition, mainly too on captured, so its more as real this was obtained in Yugoslavia, because i believe the U (Y)on buttstock was most real used on yugoslavian rifles refurbishment, question remains who made the shortage, most real the sight guard was added there.
The presented bayonet is already a Sidearm as not possible to attach on any rifle, it was overhauled and most real is a M1888 shortage.

Thanks Andy. I have the same suspicion regarding the 'y' in the butt stock. It appears the bayonet was purposely modified as a fighting knife. I've come across a couple period photos that show sheathed bayonets of one distinct type on the belts of soldiers with a completely different (and incompatible) type of rifle, so I definitely agree with your assessment as a side arm vs. bayonet.
I personally would inspect the barell, same as the lower ring looks from hungarian M95/31. The back sight is from long rifle, hungarians distance marked it different way. It could be that this shortage was mixed with parts of hungarian M95/31 - lower ring and muzzle protector. The muzzle part in front of sights is too long.Should be proofed on parts how are marked, K or R or different letter. So various pictures would be here needed to see. Dissasembly from buttstock would help to see marking on barell area under wood. The buttplate is clean? the barell previous proof is Wn eagle 17?
I should have time in the next week to disassemble the carbine and provide some photos of internal markings.
 
Thanks, i already saw similar items reworked bayonets blued within WW2 period, anyway this is a already obsolete bayonet M1888/90 which was here upgraded (in Austria was not served with post 1918), teoretically it could be used as a dress sidearm of the Waffenmeister or something else. Should be compared the screws in grips, german or different type?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
I would tend to agree that this probably originally came out of Yugoslavia. After that, though, I think the story becomes more complicated and murky.

The AC1 looks an awful lot like an Italian marking to me. Possibly captured by Italy, reworked, then seized by the Germans in 1943? Possible, but this is complicated by the Ws1.

Wels was an HZa prior to the start of the war, but by the end of the war, it seems to have vanished. Most online sources of info (Lexikon, etc.) don't even mention Wels. A 1942 document also lists Wien as the HZa for units attached to WK XVII. HZa Wien-Simmering existed by 1941 (Obstlt. Josef Zimmerer was the Kommandant effective 20 March 1941), and I have seen it mentioned that Wels was closed and moved to Wien at the same time. But this is complicated by a seemingly legit bnz42 we have posted here that is Ws1 marked. So perhaps Wels continued on as an HNZa? I don't know.


I think the Hungarian sight protector is probably a later collector addition, as the screws are a bit buggered. I suppose its possible the gun was provided to Hungary as aid, but I don't think the Hungarians would have wanted a 31M in 8x50R. I don't think they continued using the older cartridge at all, but maybe they did for Gendarmerie use?

Thanks Ryan,
I haven't been able to get any info on that marking at all. Rafael Riccio doesn't even know, and he's been doing work on Italian small arms for decades, and has had access to primary sources at least as long. Another mystery.

Good info on Wels 1. I would think that as the war progressed, priority was given to the factories at Wels rather than the Ordnance depot, not to mention Wien being much larger with more transport nodes to accommodate flow of materiel. Another possibility aside from complete replacement by Wien is simply continuous operation, but at reduced, regional specific capacity.

On the sight protector, the Csendörség definitely continued use of the 31M during the war years, which would have included the sight protector. Another Hungarian small arms enthusiast I know might have the answer regarding continued use of 8X50R.
 
Interesting info here, the Stutzen was made from a long rifle
It is in Stutzenkarabiner configuration for having both swivels.

The AC1 looks an awful lot like an Italian marking to me. Possibly captured by Italy, reworked, then seized by the Germans in 1943?
The Italians did not shorten and reconfigured M.95 rifles to M.95 Stutzenkarabiner. For the rifle still being in 8x50R caliber, if the shortening was done by Austria then it would need to had been in Austrian possession prior to 1930. Usually these would have had the HV stamp though, hence I'd rather tend to think that maybe it was Yugoslavia or someone else to shorten this rifle (unless already shortened during WWI).

PS: The sling currently attached to it is a Bulgarian sling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
The Italians did not shorten and reconfigured M.95 rifles to M.95 Stutzenkarabiner. For the rifle still being in 8x50R caliber, if the shortening was done by Austria then it would need to had been in Austrian possession prior to 1930. Usually these would have had the HV stamp though, hence I'd rather tend to think that maybe it was Yugoslavia or someone else to shorten this rifle (unless already shortened during WWI).

PS: The sling currently attached to it is a Bulgarian sling.

Yes, definitely not shortened by Italy. I just meant the AC1 looks like an Italian inspection post capture circa 1941. Here is a very similar marking on a Torino 1897 M91 that was reworked by Terni in 1940.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20231125_010336123~2.jpg
    PXL_20231125_010336123~2.jpg
    368.8 KB · Views: 13
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
Absolut,
Thanks for the ID on the sling. I wouldn't have guessed Bulgarian, but that definitely makes this more interesting.

Ryan,
Thanks for the photo. Stylistically I'd say it's similar, but I think the character in your photo is an 'M.' I agree with you that an Italian connection doesn't make much sense with this.
 
That's why I say it looks Italian. The style is an almost perfect match. I think it's very possible this was reworked in Italy though, the stamp is just too close IMO.
 
I personally dont believe it was delivered to Bulgaria, it would be not remained in this caliber, same as the shortage have still the rifle sight, should be looked its renumbered or not??
Possible the yugoslavians made similar shortages, some shortages were done in CSR too, anyway they would be austrian, CS or other property markings, which they are not. No details of marking on right receiver and on other places, question is who would place there a hungarian M95/31 front sight protector and what for time frame?.
 
Back
Top