Search results

Very nice condition rifle, i assume the letter of series is w.

The last one picture is the Ricchieri adapter on short Mauser 3cm bayonet adapter not on a 98,also it should be export piece.

RC stamp is typical for Erfurt or Suhl area.

6301d should be the serialing, after 1942 the production line of G33/40 was dissasembled, there is mostly all rifles went to Germany prior 1942, so reserialing by them is real, by CzechoSlovak probably not. There is serial on backside of handle of bolt. Other small numbers with different font...

Its not so bad condition the 6515g, more real only wrongly stored, question is too how deep is the sharpening. After oiling it would look much better probably.

N.4520k is the KM inventory marking, i dont known as there exist suffix P too that lower case k should be for Kiel, maybe Stephan98k knows the answer? Bayonets of that range were reported in 1937/8 production timeframe. 11 could be a rack number added by someone later.

I assume the 87936 hh is on receiver, on the barell looks like letters were stamped twice or over older one letters.

The receiver top marking speaks for turkish contract piece, the possible serial could be C 748 visible on the barell is czechoslovak for Vz.22, the bolt and receiver with magazine body and some other parts was mixed in time probably by turks. The sight picture should be presented.

More real its a 243 also Mundlos production so the scabbard should be so marked, in case there is 253 which could be too as hard to decipherable, it could be when no marking at mouth area its a scabbard of a portugal contract.

Non matching to the sample doesnt have serials and maker stamp, You should look at ball finial for WaA stamp?

I would think its a not sharp picture and the upper rings are not good visible details, but the rifles looks complete.

Same opinion WKC 1935 production in high blue polish, normally the scabbard should be matching, in case of non stamping at scabbard mouth area so the scabbard could be from Behoerden piece production.Frog was mostly made in 1939, from wearing traces it looks like the complet scabbard -frog is...

Most real is the area of the upper ring is not good visible on the photo, is possible the pieces are there but not visible on the picture.

Argentine 1909 bayonet should have a short slot and high ring, so only M1909 rifle Argentine could be real, withou the richieri adapter probably. This would work on any Mauser 98 system. Simson &Co was located in town Suhl a well known gunmaker city, the Peruvian bayonet contract was realised...

Looks like Peruvian M1909 which was copy of german S98. Both grips are unfortunally cracked, normally it should have a matching leather scabbard.

There should be probably C or D in front of 4304 but is not visible. WaA253 is corect proof for Mo937, its possible they could forgot to stamp it or its too weak there. in case thre is anywhere a black paint as on crossguard it looks so, it could be too a portugal repair.

Serial should be with prefix or suffix.

P prefix with E3 lion 38 should be presented what range, but when in range of 5xxxx-6xxxx so its a japan 1939 contract.

Could be too like mentioned by Slash that germans add there the rack number here, but maybe owner could help where the bayonet was found?, i could only report that similar bunch of serials were reported by norwegian members some years ago, so the possibility exist it was done too by other country.

I have a refurbished S98/05nA bayonet of same unit, most real refurbished in war to nA as the origin bayonet is Erfurt W/08 too, the unit is of 2.company 6.A.F.2.122, the bayonet is already in metall scabbard. The condition is much worser as here. On Your piece was realised switch from B to D...