43 fnj with 43 web frog

Rittmeister

Senior Member
This bayonet has been in my collection for many years. Andy probably have it in his database. The bayonet has welded scabbard and WaA stamp on spine. The frog was added by me, but I am not familiar with the producer.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0280.JPG
    IMG_0280.JPG
    53.6 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_0282.JPG
    IMG_0282.JPG
    49.8 KB · Views: 42
  • IMG_0284.JPG
    IMG_0284.JPG
    50.5 KB · Views: 40
  • IMG_0287.JPG
    IMG_0287.JPG
    51.8 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_0289.JPG
    IMG_0289.JPG
    57.7 KB · Views: 39
  • IMG_0290.JPG
    IMG_0290.JPG
    45.8 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_0293.JPG
    IMG_0293.JPG
    48.8 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_0302.JPG
    IMG_0302.JPG
    54.6 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:
nice bayonet, what is the stamping on backside of webfrog? interesting is the additional WaA519 on blade spine.thanks.
 
The stamp on frog seem too be "REP 43", but it is possible I have read it wrong. Hope it is not "48":facepalm: The use of big letters has always worried me. Will take better pictures in daylight.
 
More pictures of webfrog. Must say I become more uncertain what number this is. 40, 42, 43 or something else? Anybody familiar with stamping or this type of webfrog?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0356.JPG
    IMG_0356.JPG
    57 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_0357.JPG
    IMG_0357.JPG
    53.5 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_0358.JPG
    IMG_0358.JPG
    67 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_0177.JPG
    IMG_0177.JPG
    48.9 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_0362.JPG
    IMG_0362.JPG
    50 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_0365.JPG
    IMG_0365.JPG
    61.8 KB · Views: 19
I have one of these frogs as well with the same marking. My frog however is the version without the hilt retention strap. It is made exactly the same with the pouch being constructed of a lighter weight woven material than the body. If memory is correct, mine has more of a brownish sand colored body with a lighter tan pouch. It also has the same white cotton thread to include the unusual horizontal line of stitching at the bottom of the belt loop. The marking is in the same location and I believe it to be REP 43. The reason it is in upper case letters is because it is not a three letter code. Rather it is the maker's trademark from an unknown producer. Same as the upper case letter trademarks sometimes found on canteens, mess kits and other items. Have seen only a very few examples of these frogs and all have been 43 dated. The one from my collection is pictured in the reference section under late war and tropical frogs. I will try and take some better photos to post here for comparison.
 
Here are some photographs of the REP43 marked tropical (web) frog from my collection. Note that it never had a hilt retention strap. Frogs made of web material in this configuration are very difficult to locate. In all other respects it appears very similar in construction to Rittmeister's example. The REP maker's trademark may be for the firm of Richard Ehrhardt, Pössneck in Thüringen but this has not been confirmed. Research continues ....
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    94.9 KB · Views: 9
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 8
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 10
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    96.6 KB · Views: 7
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 9
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 5
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    97.3 KB · Views: 5
Thanks Lance for interesting opinion, yes the name could be with upper case letters, so it could be explain why is there REP.b.r.Andy
 
Back
Top