Third Party Press

Battle Harden Luger G date

ranvette

Member
A honest bring back matching
sans the mag but a interesting mag number. Uncommon type G date receiver proof i believe
 

Attachments

  • Picture 028 (1).jpg
    Picture 028 (1).jpg
    422 KB · Views: 122
  • Picture 035 (1).jpg
    Picture 035 (1).jpg
    335.2 KB · Views: 119
  • PICT2647.jpg
    PICT2647.jpg
    315.1 KB · Views: 116
  • PICT2664.jpg
    PICT2664.jpg
    223.2 KB · Views: 114
  • PICT2667.JPG
    PICT2667.JPG
    239.9 KB · Views: 125
  • PICT2673.JPG
    PICT2673.JPG
    246.8 KB · Views: 137
  • PICT2675.JPG
    PICT2675.JPG
    183.8 KB · Views: 145
  • PICT2676.jpg
    PICT2676.jpg
    285 KB · Views: 137
  • PICT2678.jpg
    PICT2678.jpg
    290.1 KB · Views: 119
  • PICT2687.jpg
    PICT2687.jpg
    258 KB · Views: 118
nice well worn and carried p08.. not all of them can be mint.. Nice to see paired up with a 41/42 dated pig skin holster.
 
That one I'm sure has a few thousand rounds out the tube.The bore is combat worn but not a spot of rust and shinny.
That sure wasn't target shooting. Its what you call well maintained to get the job done
 
I believe G date mags are eagle 154 proofed and the droop eagle 63 is 1936 only. I am not 100% certain though.
 
I believe G date mags are eagle 154 proofed and the droop eagle 63 is 1936 only. I am not 100% certain though.
Actually the DE63 started appearing in the early d block of 1935. Let me say I don’t claim to know when the first one appeared but they (DE63) were standard well before the 4000 range of the d block.
 
The 5690 on the pistol and the mag is 5680?
It's certainly a close number to have, but it just tells me it's not the original mag distributed with the pistol.
The blued body “type 2” magazine is from an end of 1936 n block Luger. It is at least 18 months after the pistol was made. We can really see the suffix block on the Luger but I’m guessing it’s a c-e most likely. IMHO most Lugers (really every one of them) that show a lot of bore wear from firing got that way from being a training school firearm that was fired by recruits regularly for years and or were fired a lot after the war when ammo was dirt cheap and usually corrosive steel jacket surplus. I believe it would be amazing if anyone fired a pistol dozens of times in close combat and survived or maybe in some exceptional cases over a period of years hundreds of rounds, which is hardly enough to break a bore in. Thousands of rounds would have never been fired out of any combat carried handgun at least in combat.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top