byf 42 Bolt question .....

What is most commonly encountered on a byf 42 rifle, a bolt that is all WaA140, all WaA135, or a mix?

Were all bolt parts on byf 42 rifles marked with a WaA or had it by 1942 already been discontinued on some parts?

Did FN supply M/O with 98k parts in addition to bolt parts and front sights?

Thanks.
 
I agree, FN bolts or unmarked would be typical to me. My byf42 ii block is has an unproofed bolt.
 
f/n parts

F/n made barrell's as well..They are coded "ch" that was f/n's wartime code. Most mauser rifles have mauser made or finished barrel's. 1942 was a huge ramp up in production for M/O so I'm sure subcontracter's were needed to fuel the kiln so to speak. Oh, just to inform those who may not know. F/n used two different inspection stamps.. Waa103 and Waa140, Both represent F/N produced parts.. 103 is more commonly seen on
front sight bases and cocking pieces. 140 shows up the most on bolt bodies.. Also un-waffenampted bolts with an "M I" stamped on the rear locking lug is a tell tale sign of an f/n bolt. There is also usually an "X" stamped on the top just below the serial number and other small letter stamps that will indicate f/n production. Astrawerke bolts show up later on mauser O. produced rifles..After f/n's liberation..
 
Last edited:
Actually FN used 3 waffenamts throughout their occupation and all 3 are known for barrel production/acceptance. (e/613 e/103 and e/140)

MO and FN had a close relationship because they were sister firms, - DWM at one time owned both firms until 1918, where FN was outright stolen from them by the Belgian government in a flagrant violation of commercial law. DWM/Luwig Loewe was not a government owned firm in 1919, yet they were stripped of ownership all the same.. the nazis in an unusual act, decided to give FN back to DWM (and they put DWM/MO managers at FN- though still heavily under military oversight).

Of course this was more symbolic in nature, as "private" corporations at the time were strictly regulated, from materials, labor, to products made- as well as profit margins, currency laws etc.. making them essentially private owned but in every way government managed.

It was unusual though for the time, as “generally” firms like FN would have been absorbed by the Reichswerke (through a subsidiary like Steyr or Rheinmetall) or some government owned firm like Gustloff Werke/Trust. Most likely it was the people behind DWM that made this happen- the CEO of DWM was a big-nazi dirtbag, with lots of connections (x-wife was married to “Gerbils” the propaganda minister)- and of course the number one best friend of all socialist governments (from Hitler to obama), the banks, were the REAL owners of LL/DWM/MO 1890s-1945.

All this will be covered in the next MRJ -
 
Back
Top