My "Polish Unicorn": 1933 FB Radom Kbk.S.Wz.31 Trainer

krukster86

Well-known member
This is my latest Polish rifle, a 1933 dated FB Radom Kbk.S.Wz.31 (Karabinek “Sportowy” Wzor 1931, or “Sporting Short Rifle Model 1931”), which is a .22lr trainer, stylized like the Wz.29 short rifle of the era in use with the Polish Military. These are exceedingly rare to find in the US, as I have personally only seen one come up for sale in my comparatively short collecting hobby. These trainers are very briefly mentioned in a few books and Internet articles, though I found a small morsel of decent information from some Polish language resources, which I will do my best to summarize (though I am open to corrections if someone has additional information).

After Poland gained its independence after WWI, there was immediately a need to develop its military and train its new recruits accordingly. At first, there were no specific “training” rifles on hand, and trainees primarily used shotguns for introductory firearms training at short distances before they moved onto use of the standard issue military rifles. There was a growing need to have a dedicated “training rifle” in a low caliber for use with trainees to get them used to shooting and fundamentals before moving onto full size military rifles. The Polish military and the domestic arms developers started to do research into what other countries were doing at the time for trainers.

The first iteration of military “trainers” were not purpose built training rifles like the KKW .22lr trainers in Nazi Germany, but modified/rechambered battle rifles. These were Karabinek Wz. 1898 (Polish K98) carbines that were converted to .22lr barrels, had their Mauser 98 bolts extensively modified to .22lr rimfire, and had their magazines deactivated to single shot only. From an outward appearance with the bolt closed, these are virtually identical to a regular Polish K98, but had a large “22” added to the handguard to prevent misfeeding the wrong ammunition. I have only come across one resource for this, but these appear to have been designated the Kbk.S.Wz.29.

The second iteration of a military training rifle was this rifle, the Kbk.S.Wz.31. It was designed from the ground up as a purpose-made .22lr trainer and not adapted/converted from an existing rifle. It was designed to mimic the look and feel of the Wz.29 short rifle. These trainers were produced by FB Radom exclusively from 1932 to 1939, but I have no idea what the production figures were, as this documentation was probably lost during World War II.

Compared to a normal Wz.29, this trainer does have a simplified bolt that is not of a Mauser 98 design, but rather very similar to the design of the post-war Wz.48 Mosin Nagant .22lr trainer. It does not have an extractor/ejector built into the bolt, but is rather that is accomplished via a sliding part that slides in the feed tray when the bolt is opened/closed, and pulls out and ejects the spent case when the bolt is pulled back. It is single shot only, as evidenced by the lack of an internal magazine as part of the triggerguard. It has a simplified rear sight ladder, with one set of numbers ranging from 2-10, corresponding to a distance of 20 to 100 meters. It has a fully functional bayonet lug, so I would assume that it could be used for bayonet training. These were not actually blued, like the other military Mausers, but zinc parkerized with enamel black paint applied on top. This example still has some of the original paint near the woodline, but otherwise the exterior metal has that enamel paint rubbed off, and the surface finish has turned into patina.

The trigger is a two stage Mauser trigger, but with a very simple tension bar mechanism for the “spring”.

The receiver itself seems to be manufactured from a cylinder/tube rather than the fine machining of a Mauser 98 receiver. The handguard retaining lip wraps around the entire circumference of the receiver rather than just half like on a Wz.29.

This particular example was able to be affordable for me for a couple of reasons. The stock is duffel cut, which means it was likely a USGI bring back. I am most likely not going to repair the duffel cut, as part of the history (and I am pretty sure the recoil of .22lr is not going to blow it out when shooting). A retaining screw in the bolt is missing, but it doesn’t impact the function or operation. I can probably source a replacement equivalent pignose head screw from McMaster Carr based on some photos of complete examples. I spoke with Battlefield Curator (on YouTube) and his buddy that has one of these is missing that screw as well, and it runs just fine without it. The stock clearly has been sanded, as it has some rounded curvature to some features that should be “sharp”, and the Polish proofs on the wood at the wrist and butt are only barely outlined when I shine the light just right. I did notice that the front barrel band spring is snapped, which should be easy to fix/replace, as this is a component shared with many Mauser 98 pattern rifles. These factors did help in bringing down the price SIGNIFICANTLY compared to some “legacy” searches of closing bids at auction and boutique milsurp sellers. The rarity kinda comes into play here, so yeah it is a little bit “off” and not ideal, but it isn’t like you can check back on GunBroker next month and find another let alone replacement parts.

The following parts are matching: receiver, rear sight ladder, buttplate, ejector/extractor, and bolt body.

The following parts are not serialized, but have either “Polish Lucky Charms” or inspector markings: Trigger assembly, bayonet lug, rear sling swivel, sling bar, rear sight spring, front sight.

The following parts appear to be mismatched: handguard (handwritten T105), barrel is simply stamped “17” with some random small proofmarks, and the rear sight base is stamped “23”.

Curiously, the stock (wood) itself doesn’t appear to be serialized.

All in all, I am extremely happy to have this in my Polish collection and plan to have my son shoot this as his a first firearm, once he is old enough.

IMG_5310.JPGIMG_5311.JPGIMG_5312.JPGIMG_5313.JPGIMG_5314.JPGIMG_5315.JPGIMG_5318.JPGIMG_5321.JPGIMG_5322.JPGIMG_5324.JPG
 
Very cool and unusual rifle. Thanks for posting it and the information. I now recognize it from your earlier post with the screw. Does this eject the spent cartridge? Wondering how the semi circular device in the bottom of the chamber works.
 
Very cool and unusual rifle. Thanks for posting it and the information. I now recognize it from your earlier post with the screw. Does this eject the spent cartridge? Wondering how the semi circular device in the bottom of the chamber works.
To be completely honest, I’m not sure. I used some .22lr snap caps and it feeds/extracts/ejects just fine without the screw. I think maybe it is a “new recruit” security measure to keep them from disassembling the bolt? I haven’t taken the bolt apart yet.
 
The screw to me looks like it helps guide the striker in the groove and maybe keeps it from rotating when applying the safety? Perhaps it could jump the sear if it rotates?
 
The bolt set up is alot like the wz48 training rifle. The semi circle in the bottom of reciever is the extractor it helps guide round in and extracts the spent case. I think you might be right on the screw Mark. The safety is down to fire and in the middle for safe? Thats how the wz48 works i just dug mine out and checked it out. That bolt doesn't use a screw in it like yours.
 
FYI, for another interesting point of note: the Poles did a good job designing this trainer to replicate a Wz.29. I compared the trainer to an example of a full size Wz.29:
Overall length for both: 43" from muzzle to buttplate.
Overall weight for both: 8.8-9.0 lbs.
 
The bolt set up is alot like the wz48 training rifle. The semi circle in the bottom of reciever is the extractor it helps guide round in and extracts the spent case. I think you might be right on the screw Mark. The safety is down to fire and in the middle for safe? Thats how the wz48 works i just dug mine out and checked it out. That bolt doesn't use a screw in it like yours.
the post war variant was basically the same action in a Nagant dress. These are fairly scarce Ive seen a dozen or so over the years. I feel the 98a conversion to .22kal seems a bit more scarce.
 
the post war variant was basically the same action in a Nagant dress. These are fairly scarce Ive seen a dozen or so over the years. I feel the 98a conversion to .22kal seems a bit more scarce.
Yes, regarding the K98 .22 trainers, I’ve seen 1 complete example sell well over $3k last year. There was one sold this year for $900 but it was heavily sporterized.
 
The screw to me looks like it helps guide the striker in the groove and maybe keeps it from rotating when applying the safety? Perhaps it could jump the sear if it rotates?
biggymu: I think you may be right. I was playing with the bolt last night and cycling it in the action quickly multiple times and at one point the cocker/striker did get rotated out of the 9-o’clock position, and temporarily got snagged on the rear receiver. I would surmise that the head of the screw fits into a groove on both sides of the rear receiver as a guide to keep it from slipping out of place. Good observation!
 
Here are some pic. to go with what you were talking about on a K98 --.22 no .22 on handguard though.
 

Attachments

  • P1010374.JPG
    P1010374.JPG
    32.8 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_0446.JPG
    IMG_0446.JPG
    48.8 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_0447.JPG
    IMG_0447.JPG
    31 KB · Views: 22
FYI, I posted this rifle on Reddit (r/Milsurp) and in the comments (and personal chats received), it appears that there was another individual that has a gorgeous example from the first year of production (1932). Curiously, his is marked M.31 on the receiver side rail. His example has gorgeous stock proofs that are sanded away in mine.

IMG_5550.jpegIMG_5577.jpegIMG_5576.jpegIMG_5546.jpegIMG_5548.jpeg
 
To be completely honest, I’m not sure. I used some .22lr snap caps and it feeds/extracts/ejects just fine without the screw. I think maybe it is a “new recruit” security measure to keep them from disassembling the bolt? I haven’t taken the bolt apart yet.
Great rifle Mark! I like the beech stock-- shame it's sanded, but it still presents really well.

The screw seems reminiscent of the 71 pattern rifles, but clearly performs a different function, as it doesnt look to prevent bolt removal.
 
The screw seems reminiscent of the 71 pattern rifles, but clearly performs a different function, as it doesnt look to prevent bolt removal.
Thanks Chris! I pretty much confirmed that the screw in the bolt is there to provide a guide to keep the cocking piece from spinning out of position when cycling the bolt. I installed a temporary replacement from a box of random machine screws I have in my work room to confirm this.

At some point I’ll go to ace hardware and find a correctly sized pig nose or snake eye security screw of the right thread and pitch and cut it down to size so that it looks close to the original. It is quite an odd screw, a large pan-head with only a couple mm of thread length.
 
This solved a riddle for me. I have a 98b shortened to K98 specs (mismatched) and it has the Hex/D stamp on the pistol grip. I was unable to identify the mark
 
Very cool rifle. Never have seen one of these before. Quick question, how does one place a .22 and cycle the bolt to fire the round, I see no feed ramp, but appears to be a piece of metal it sits on—probably a dumb question and obvious.
 
Very cool rifle. Never have seen one of these before. Quick question, how does one place a .22 and cycle the bolt to fire the round, I see no feed ramp, but appears to be a piece of metal it sits on—probably a dumb question and obvious.
Kind of annoying actually. You need to manually place the round partially in the chamber, then close the bolt all the way.
 
Kind of annoying actually. You need to manually place the round partially in the chamber, then close the bolt all the way.
That is what I figured still a way cool rifle. Thanks for showing it off. Cool fix on the bolt.
 
FYI:

As I posted on GunBoards, I had a bit of a head scratcher moment when I tried to cycle the action with .22lr snap caps, and found that the .22lr only went in 70% of the way into the chamber. I was thinking it got rechambered for something else (like .17 HM2). I did a Cerrosafe chamber cast and confirmed with .22 short snap caps, my rifle is chambered in .22 short, not .22lr!

I did a bit more research on this. I had an article in Polish that I think I got from Tokarev38.
IMG_5596.jpeg

Prior to the limited discussion of the Kbk.S.Wz.31, there was some discussion of the Kbk.S.Wz.30, its civilian model predecessor. These were made in both .22lr and .22 short. It appears that there were some issues with production of .22 short and starting in 1934, these were only made in .22lr from then on.

Later on, the article does not specify the chambering of the Kbk.S.Wz31 (just that it is in .22 cal). It could be that these were offered in both .22lr and .22 short as well.
 
Back
Top