hale1940
Canadian Fabio
So...
There is a bnz 43 single rune on GB. It appears to be quite an early rifle from the SS contract, judging by whats visible of the barrel code and the fittings. However, I have a few concerns, and I know some others do too.
First, the left side of the butt stock appears lighter then the rest of the rifle, and almost looks likes its got some very faint traces of some vertical numbers.
Second, the trigger guard is unnumbered. I know things with the SS contract, especially early on, can be a bit wonky but its certainly out of the ordinary.
Third, and this relates to the first concern, no internal wood numbers are photographed or mentioned.
Finally, gun came from pre98 five years ago. Make of that what you will. https://pre98.com/shop/rare-single-rune-bnz43-k98k-rifle-matching-ss-contract-rifle/
I'd like it to be legit. If it was it would be a very neat rifle. But I certainly feel a bit skeptical. But I'd like to hear what some more experienced members think.
There is a bnz 43 single rune on GB. It appears to be quite an early rifle from the SS contract, judging by whats visible of the barrel code and the fittings. However, I have a few concerns, and I know some others do too.
First, the left side of the butt stock appears lighter then the rest of the rifle, and almost looks likes its got some very faint traces of some vertical numbers.
Second, the trigger guard is unnumbered. I know things with the SS contract, especially early on, can be a bit wonky but its certainly out of the ordinary.
Third, and this relates to the first concern, no internal wood numbers are photographed or mentioned.
Finally, gun came from pre98 five years ago. Make of that what you will. https://pre98.com/shop/rare-single-rune-bnz43-k98k-rifle-matching-ss-contract-rifle/
I'd like it to be legit. If it was it would be a very neat rifle. But I certainly feel a bit skeptical. But I'd like to hear what some more experienced members think.
Last edited: