Dreyse Jägerbüchse M/54

Spartaner545

Senior Member
Hello everyone,

since there are already some dreyse needle rifles here in the forum and at least some of you seem to enjoy them i will do my part and show a few of my rifles here. As i mostly collect cavalry and jaegers and the M/57 cavlary carbine has been posted by Chris, i will cover some jaeger rifles starting with the M/54.

Barrel length: 73 cm
Overall length: 123 cm
Overall length with bayonets extended all the way: 166 cm

My rifle is all matching and in nice condition with the ram rod bayonet still present. Produced in 1858 in Spandau, serial number 5772. It is unit marked to the 2nd Matrosen-Division (2nd sailor division). Unknown "IV" marking on the butt. The M/54 was never updated with the Beck conversion.


Please enjoy and with kind regards

Vincent





For those who are interested, a bit of interesting background history: Jägerbüchse M/54.

This was the first dreyse rifle for the 8 regular jaeger bataillons of the prussian army since only the two guard bataillons had been issued the dreyse Jägerbüchse M/49. This rifle was adopted in 1855 as the M/54 and within four years, nearly all jeager units were equipped with this new rifle. It was the standart jaeger weapon for the wars of 1864 and 1866. In the mid to late 1860's the jaeger bataillons had their new rifle given to them, the Jägerbüchse 1865. Now the old M/54's were either given to the navy or were reworked into the pioneer rifle UM for the pioneer bataillons. This may be the reason why the Jägerbüchse M/54 is a rare dreyse rifle to find.

To say that the very proud and traditionally focused jeagers didnt liked this new rifle really is an understatment. They actually hated it!
In their eyes this rifles was not a Jägerbüchse at all. Several important characteristics of a typical Jägerbüchse were missing. The barrel was round, not octagonal and it was fixed to the stock with bands rather then pins. There was no set trigger system, the brass elements were under-decorated and worst of all, there was no bayonet lug for the Hirschfänger, the traditional jaeger bayonet due to the "built in" ram rod bayonet. If it was not for the sling attachment behind the hand guard the rifle would look like a typical prussian line infantry weapon. When reading battle reports from 1864 the jeagers stated that this new ram rod bayonet was a complete failure. It was weak and broke or bend when used to parry a sabre blow from enemy cavalry.

If those reports are true and the ram rod bayonet was a real combat issue and not just the injured pride of the angry jaegers speaking, is not known to me. Because the prussian navy also got their hands in those Jägerbüchse M/54 and they liked them a lot and used them for many years without complaining about weak bayonets. But then again, most boarding actions usually do not involve getting charged at by mass cavalry formations... Between 1859 and 1875 the prussian and later imperial navy ordered and used 1,348 M/54 rifles. Those navy rifles had their barrels in the white although there are some rare navy examples with blued barrels.

99,9 percent of the surviving Jägerbüchse M/54 are from the navy contracts of 1859 and 1868/1869. It is only in one old book from the 1970's were i have seen a M/54 with jaeger unit markings.
 

Attachments

  • Komplette Ansicht.jpg
    Komplette Ansicht.jpg
    117.2 KB · Views: 41
  • 20201223_144519.jpg
    20201223_144519.jpg
    234.7 KB · Views: 30
  • 20201223_144526.jpg
    20201223_144526.jpg
    194.2 KB · Views: 20
  • 20201223_144649.jpg
    20201223_144649.jpg
    216.6 KB · Views: 16
  • 20201223_144643.jpg
    20201223_144643.jpg
    100 KB · Views: 14
  • 20201223_144918.jpg
    20201223_144918.jpg
    191.9 KB · Views: 14
  • 20201223_144821.jpg
    20201223_144821.jpg
    210.2 KB · Views: 12
  • 20201223_144837.jpg
    20201223_144837.jpg
    128.2 KB · Views: 13
  • 20201223_144859.jpg
    20201223_144859.jpg
    255.3 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
More pictures
 

Attachments

  • 20201223_144534.jpg
    20201223_144534.jpg
    249.4 KB · Views: 10
  • 20201223_144541.jpg
    20201223_144541.jpg
    262.1 KB · Views: 9
  • 20201223_144549.jpg
    20201223_144549.jpg
    271.2 KB · Views: 12
  • 20201223_144556.jpg
    20201223_144556.jpg
    171.4 KB · Views: 18
  • 20201223_144615.jpg
    20201223_144615.jpg
    115.5 KB · Views: 8
  • 20201223_144624.jpg
    20201223_144624.jpg
    227.2 KB · Views: 8
  • 20201223_144631.jpg
    20201223_144631.jpg
    290.1 KB · Views: 9
Ram rod bayonet
 

Attachments

  • 20201223_144705.jpg
    20201223_144705.jpg
    218.8 KB · Views: 9
  • 20201223_144711.jpg
    20201223_144711.jpg
    204.5 KB · Views: 11
  • 20201223_144805.jpg
    20201223_144805.jpg
    267.4 KB · Views: 10
  • 20201223_144736.jpg
    20201223_144736.jpg
    251.2 KB · Views: 13
  • 20201223_144756.jpg
    20201223_144756.jpg
    209.4 KB · Views: 13
  • 20201223_144747.jpg
    20201223_144747.jpg
    212 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
That is a gorgeous and extremely rare rifle thank you for sharing. I've only seen one for sale here in the states and it was a complete mix matcher
 
Beautiful rifle Vincent! I'd love to find an M54..im hoping patience pays off as it has with other models. As Jordan said, Zündnadelgewehren are rare in general in the US. Even the "common" ones like an m62 are hard to find nice. I'm lucky to have the ones I do, but posts like this make me want to look even harder for more! :)

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
 
Very nice,
Thank you

Thank you for your kind comment.

That is a gorgeous and extremely rare rifle thank you for sharing. I've only seen one for sale here in the states and it was a complete mix matcher

Glad you enjoyed it. I remeber seeing one of those M/54 for auction in the US a few years ago. It was in bad shape and the ram rod was missing. Dont know for how much it was sold.

Beautiful rifle Vincent! I'd love to find an M54..im hoping patience pays off as it has with other models. As Jordan said, Zündnadelgewehren are rare in general in the US. Even the "common" ones like an m62 are hard to find nice. I'm lucky to have the ones I do, but posts like this make me want to look even harder for more! :)

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk

Thanks, Chris! I was looking for over 6 years to find this rifle. They are tough to find, even here in germany... and if you find one the prices are really high. Maybe one day i find a M/54 with Jeager markings but its unlikley. On the other side, the hunt for these old items are part of the fun of collecting.
 
Very nice! I have a M54 as well.

I have never figured out the unit marking, however. On the top of the receiver is a "734", and on top of the buttplate is a "734 1".
 
Last edited:
Very nice! I have a M54 as well.

I have never figured out the unit marking, however. On the top of the receiver is a "734", and on top of the buttplate is a "734 1".

Would you mind sharing the unit marking here? The individual weapon number of navy markings are often repeated on the top of the receiver. Thats why i would guess that your rifle is navy as well. Maybe the "1" is the rest of an "M" from the "K M" navy marking?
 
Back
Top