FWIW, both bands are marked with the 4-digit serial (but no letter), in the same font, which appears to be very similar (if not matching) to the barrel and receiver).
@tokarev38 - Thanks for the info. A couple of questions:
- Was numbering of the trigger guard common? I wasn’t aware that was a numbered part.
- I don’t see any obvious indications the stock is two-piece. What indicators are you looking at?
Thanks!!
I recently picked up my first Radom rifle - a 1931 K29. It’s got a mix of markings and characteristics that make for a fuzzy history.
The receiver and barrel match. The inside of the handguard also matches. I don’t see any serial numbers on the buttstock (but maybe I’m not looking in the right...
I have a fairly nice G98/40 with one exception: it’s missing the ejector. I tried calling Jack First (I know they used to produce them) but they stopped and they don’t have any collecting dust anywhere.
Is there any source for an ejector - other than finding another G98/40 or 43M and parting it...
I went down that rabbit hole with the same marking on my G98/40…there are no definitive sources for any of the theories. Here are some of the possible fragments I collected - none of which have any true provenance:
VVV
υπουργείο, it means ministry
Legion λεγεώνας
Popular Λαϊκός
People (mass)...
Not quite the same thing as the “completely matching” you stated in your first post. Having numbered parts that match versus having all the numbered parts makes a big difference. The stock and the inside of the handguard should be numbered to the rifle. Are they? The front and rear bands should...