Search results

Possible the Avranches is on the 1. same is possible there was short written Gouvix on Normandie by 3. ...ix is there certainly. Nr6 could be deciphered when looked at picture? Mire..h.. end was overwrite as mostly error was there

The modell is japanese T30 question remains its a training bayonet or a chinese copy bayonet.

Nr6 should be " Italien .. einem .... ??? im August 1943" Nr.5 is correct deciphered but location is unknown, maybe photo could help? bei Breut..lle nr.3 corect Mai 43 location in area of Normandie? Nr.2 " Tante " Ju most real Junkers 52? should be presented the picture? Nr1 looks like 1942...

The rifles G33/40 were all delivered to end of summer 1942 to Wehrmacht depots, so no real guns in area of Czechoslovakia when 1945 partly "liberated" by Soviets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi%C5%82a The Landjägerei is a Landes Gendarmerie in that case. Certainly not typical marking. But the marking looks here more as late 30ies and not as proper Police unit. no dots there between the letters ,no district number etc.

There could be two possibilities, use a normal german S84/98 frog or use a older austrian M88/95 or Czechoslovak Vz.24 frog.

dot 42 is not a K98 bayonet, its a S24(t) bayonet.

Personally it doesnt look like a Landjaegerei bayonet, firstly the marking is not in correct manner for police stamped, secondly here is NS period refurbishment typical for hidden equipment as this piece probably doesnt have any 1920 stamp?? was not presented here, on a police item it should be...

1952 janos Herback frog is romanian for Vz24 bayonet.

Very nice rifle in excellent condition, much harder would be found a proper bayonet for it. The rifle is a copy of CS Vz.24 rifle delivered to Lithuania few years earlier.

the first a is different as the next e, so in reality there is Marseille in sutterlin. on end is the letter e better visible.

Looks ok to me, well used with non dissmounted grips.

When there are not any CS marking on backside of the frog, so it should be probably austrian origin. personally i would inspect this for possible reblue or its on the coat of vaseline on surface, but the surface on same places looks like pitted someday?. Anyway a early matching Durkopp is nice.

czechoslovak Vz.24 bayonet postwar made under code tgf and proofed 1946,8 or 50.

Its a postwar K98k made in Zbrojovka Brno CSR, E3 speaks for pre 1948 production, mostly not completely CS proofed for army but went to Export.

Thanks it corespond with the 1969 reproof.

Normally the grips on bayonet should be wood.

September 1976 reproofed in Bavaria mostly for Frankonia.

Thanks for additional photos, Y teoretically could be from last romanian contract in series XR and YR, or its only coincidence and mistake stamp, outside of buttstock it does not looks like letter in front of 5670. Is anything marked on upper handguard? By the series are problems Smid mentioned...

Easy to explain on Romanian second contract as already all rifles were made for Romania, here in AR range with E4 lion 39 proof, even already Czechoslovakia didnt existed since 15.3.1939 as slovak proof facility to end of 1939 used the older CS marking and E4 proof stamp, which was fluently...