1917 V.CHR.SCHILLING

toulon44

Senior Member
Hello all

just to share with you my last WW1 G98 , it's all matching ,just the front small locking screw is missing .
here are some pics .
 

Attachments

  • 0.jpg
    0.jpg
    416 KB · Views: 58
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    353.4 KB · Views: 61
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    333.8 KB · Views: 54
  • 2a.jpg
    2a.jpg
    296.6 KB · Views: 50
  • 2b.jpg
    2b.jpg
    275.9 KB · Views: 45
  • 2c1.jpg
    2c1.jpg
    514.8 KB · Views: 40
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    308.4 KB · Views: 40
  • 3a.jpg
    3a.jpg
    345.4 KB · Views: 56
triggerguard , rear sight , stock ...
 

Attachments

  • 4c.jpg
    4c.jpg
    395.2 KB · Views: 21
  • 41.jpg
    41.jpg
    387.2 KB · Views: 19
  • 4a1.jpg
    4a1.jpg
    357.2 KB · Views: 19
  • 4b.jpg
    4b.jpg
    370.9 KB · Views: 17
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    341.9 KB · Views: 19
  • 7 copie1.jpg
    7 copie1.jpg
    468.2 KB · Views: 23
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    309.8 KB · Views: 25
bolt ....
 

Attachments

  • 6a.jpg
    6a.jpg
    289.9 KB · Views: 15
  • 6b.jpg
    6b.jpg
    302.9 KB · Views: 13
  • 6d.jpg
    6d.jpg
    244.6 KB · Views: 15
  • 6e.jpg
    6e.jpg
    287.8 KB · Views: 14
  • 7b.jpg
    7b.jpg
    361.5 KB · Views: 14
  • 7c.jpg
    7c.jpg
    343 KB · Views: 14
  • 81.jpg
    81.jpg
    337.6 KB · Views: 16
T, Very interesting rifle, though it seems to deviate from trends regarding the stock pattern, - the small B above the cypher typically moves to the normal pattern (large B under the acceptance) by the e-block of 1917, so a little retarded compared to known patterns, but I will have to make more comparisons to see how much flexibility exists... I am sure this is just an abnormality or one off (because all looks right) but for trends this is interesting (especially in that you catch all the important angles bolt lower flat and BC (though a shot of the wrist acceptance and lower buttstock pattern would be very helpful!)

A Suhl this nice is not easy to find in the US, though 1917's do tend to be easier to find nice than a 1916 (and Suhl made a lot more rifles in 1916 than 1917)
 
thanks , for loewe here they go , the stamps are not the best , very faints .
the two first S/N and lower buttstock and the third the wrist
 

Attachments

  • 7d.jpg
    7d.jpg
    372.9 KB · Views: 9
  • 7e.jpg
    7e.jpg
    370.9 KB · Views: 9
  • 7f.jpg
    7f.jpg
    370.1 KB · Views: 9
Thank you! All very interesting, I trended the rifle and the e-block is the general change but there was one other case of the upper location of the "B" after the e-block of 1917, an L-block JPS, so this is not exceptional. There is a report of a 1918 also but I can't say I noticed it in time to evaluate its originality...

Really though trends are only a mere glimpse of what occured and I think your rifle is right and this may be a more common abnormal trend viewed across a fuller spectrum of original rifles...
 
A very nice rifle @toulon44, Christian Schilling rifles are very rare and yours being all matching is double nice. Thank you for sharing it in here!

@Loewe, not sure what you mean by the 1918 rifle you didn't notice in time to evaluate it .. in 2014 I posted my Chr. Schilling Gew98 with 1918 receiver date in here (see HERE).
 
Georg, I meant I noted this other rifle in trends when addressing this rifle, - earlier I had trended this rifle and did some comparisons with the L-block and others in 1917, but when these new pictures arrived I didn't have that particular rifle on this laptop... I agree, VCS rifles seem much scarcer than JPS & CGH, regardless of year! (this is true in trends and observations over 20 years...)
 
Back
Top