Cyrano4747
Well-known member
I saw Chris make a comment elsewhere that 1917 DWMs are a touch uncommon, and that got me off my butt to post some pics of this one. I've been combing through my collection to re-photograph stuff over the last year or so and did this one maybe six months ago, so happily I had them on hand.
The rifle is a bolt m/m with a duffel cut. I picked it up maybe 15 years or so from a collector buddy. The duffel cut has some earlier attempts at a repair that did not hold. I've been looking at fixing that for over a decade now, just never got around to it. There is one oddity with one of the screws that I'll get to in a bit.
It's a very clean gun, to the point that I have gone on and off thinking the receiver in particular had been cleaned. Having it apart on my bench more recently and looking at the receiver above and below the wood line I'm now leaning to it just being really clean to begin with. Opinions appreciated on this if anyone feels strongly one way or the other.
As always, if anyone needs or wants specific pictures of a part tell me, I'm taking pretty exhaustive pics of every marking and part I can while it's apart on my bench. If there's something you're interested in chances are I have an image of it.
First the basics. Over all view of the rifle:


Receiver.

Sidewall, SN, and stamps:



Barrel SN, stamps, and manufacturer info:




Rear sight and front sight.



The rifle is a bolt m/m with a duffel cut. I picked it up maybe 15 years or so from a collector buddy. The duffel cut has some earlier attempts at a repair that did not hold. I've been looking at fixing that for over a decade now, just never got around to it. There is one oddity with one of the screws that I'll get to in a bit.
It's a very clean gun, to the point that I have gone on and off thinking the receiver in particular had been cleaned. Having it apart on my bench more recently and looking at the receiver above and below the wood line I'm now leaning to it just being really clean to begin with. Opinions appreciated on this if anyone feels strongly one way or the other.
As always, if anyone needs or wants specific pictures of a part tell me, I'm taking pretty exhaustive pics of every marking and part I can while it's apart on my bench. If there's something you're interested in chances are I have an image of it.
First the basics. Over all view of the rifle:


Receiver.

Sidewall, SN, and stamps:



Barrel SN, stamps, and manufacturer info:




Rear sight and front sight.


