Hello everyone!
I just came across an interesting Gewehr 98 (Spandau 1916, serial number in the k range, all matching numbers), which at first seemed to be a fairly typical rifle from the era, but with a blued receiver and bolt. Upon closer inspection I noticed that the bolt has been re-stamped to match the rest of the rifle (very similar to this Spandau 1916 example). The stock has imperial markings and a matching serial number, but it has no armorer markings, and the stock data disk has been replaced by the reinforced hole for bolt disassembly.
The most interesting part ist that the rifle also has some WWII-era stampings (one between the chamber and the rear sight, and one on the underside of the stock - barely visible but it's there). Has anyone seen such stampings before on pre-WWII equipment?
My main question is: is the rework of the bolt and the bluing of the receiver something that would have been done pre-1945 (or even pre-1918)? Or is it more likely that someone has messed with the gun after 1945 (since I couldn't find any armorer's stampings...)?
Any help / experience is appreciated!
I just came across an interesting Gewehr 98 (Spandau 1916, serial number in the k range, all matching numbers), which at first seemed to be a fairly typical rifle from the era, but with a blued receiver and bolt. Upon closer inspection I noticed that the bolt has been re-stamped to match the rest of the rifle (very similar to this Spandau 1916 example). The stock has imperial markings and a matching serial number, but it has no armorer markings, and the stock data disk has been replaced by the reinforced hole for bolt disassembly.
The most interesting part ist that the rifle also has some WWII-era stampings (one between the chamber and the rear sight, and one on the underside of the stock - barely visible but it's there). Has anyone seen such stampings before on pre-WWII equipment?
My main question is: is the rework of the bolt and the bluing of the receiver something that would have been done pre-1945 (or even pre-1918)? Or is it more likely that someone has messed with the gun after 1945 (since I couldn't find any armorer's stampings...)?
Any help / experience is appreciated!