williammichaelsexton
Active member
I would like to get some input from you guys on your opinions of removing rust and to what extent you guys consider cleaning up an older firearm beneficial and at what point it becomes damaging to its history and value. As posted before, my 1916 Amberg Gewehr as a good bit of surface wear and dark spots, especially on the white receiver and bolt. The firearm was very rusted when I received it (also posted elsewhere) and the method I used to clean it was liberal amounts of CLP and a copper brush. While I ‘scrubbed’ the in-the-white parts somewhat aggressively, I didn’t apply any brushes to the parts that were blued, in fear of removing the bluing. The blued parts I only wiped down with a cotton towel and CLP. While there is no serious pitting on the firearm, its exterior has seen better days, the bluing is lacking, and under the stock line there is serious rust on the receiver and trigger assembly that I would like to further remove.
I have been recently introduced to an electrolysis tank method for cleaning up the surfaces of firearms and rust and have been considering it. It is my understanding that this method will remove all rust (and other things such as dried cosmoline) without damaging the metal or remove the bluing. While I don’t have any pics to share of the more rusted parts under the stock, let’s just say that they are quite orange from oxidation.
What would you suggest regarding how I should move forward? I realise that the big rust needs to be removed, but should every single piece that has ‘character’ be cleaned up, such as barrel bands, sights, etc.? I would like this firearm to show its age and character and not be in ‘new’ condition, but at the same time it seems as if I should clean it up the best I can without damaging what’s original underneath.
Would you rather have a firearm that’s 100 years old and shows the ‘been there done that’ dirty look or one that has been cleaned well, but not to the point of damaging, but then only shows maybe 30-50% of original bluing in some places?
I have been recently introduced to an electrolysis tank method for cleaning up the surfaces of firearms and rust and have been considering it. It is my understanding that this method will remove all rust (and other things such as dried cosmoline) without damaging the metal or remove the bluing. While I don’t have any pics to share of the more rusted parts under the stock, let’s just say that they are quite orange from oxidation.
What would you suggest regarding how I should move forward? I realise that the big rust needs to be removed, but should every single piece that has ‘character’ be cleaned up, such as barrel bands, sights, etc.? I would like this firearm to show its age and character and not be in ‘new’ condition, but at the same time it seems as if I should clean it up the best I can without damaging what’s original underneath.
Would you rather have a firearm that’s 100 years old and shows the ‘been there done that’ dirty look or one that has been cleaned well, but not to the point of damaging, but then only shows maybe 30-50% of original bluing in some places?